|
|
Online: |
¬ User: 0 |
¬ Gäste: 38 |
Besucher: |
¬ Heute: 1038 |
¬ Gestern: 1643 |
¬ Gesamt: 2018140 |
¬ ø Tag: 243.18 |
Max.: |
¬ pro Tag: 3598 |
¬ Online: 540 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum |
» Offtopic » Forum: Offtopic » Thread: Lastly air max classic bw black |
|
[ Neuer Eintrag - letzter Post ] |
Thread |
Seite: « 1 » |
#1 |
» 18.03.16 04:21h |
|
My Competitor Has a Better Product plus articles and information on Sales The topic of this issue's article is a response to a question submitted by one of my newsletter readers. QUESTION - "At the moment nike roshe run uk sale , my petitor's have a far better productdeal, due to circumstances out of my control. However, customers go to the petitor and then e to me to pare. How do I go about convincing the customer that our serviceproduct is better even though on paper it isn't???" ANSWER - Thanks for the question. I'm going to answer this to the extent that I can without knowing what it is that you or your petitor sell. I believe that this is a mon experience for many of us in sales. Customers use us for free for all kinds of freebies - information, demos, test drive's, consulting, etc. Sure, it is good to give away something free to expose people to your offering (my newsletter is an example of this). This has gone way too far however, and it's our fault in the sales profession. We have been bludgeoned into thinking that we must do whatever it is that the customer asks of us. That we should jump through hoops like trick dogs, if that gets us just a little bit closer to *possibly* getting a sale. Freebies should be used as a marketing tool. The purpose of freebies is to generate a lead. And that's where the free giveaways should end. Once you have the lead, and are able to engage the customer in live conversation, the marketing ends and the selling begins. Suessful selling is an exchange of value for value. It has always been this way since people traded grains and cloth for chickens and pigs. Today as sales professionals we are "representing" a pany and its products. This is why we are called "sales representatives". We act as the agent, representing our pany in the trade air max 2014 grey , representing our pany in the exchange of value for value. As sales reps, we offer significant value to our prospective customers. Yes our products have value, but I am not talking about that. The value that we offer is our knowledge and our time. We know a lot about our products, about our industry, about future trends in our marketplace, about our petition, and many other things. We sell our products every day. Our customers (most of them at least) do not buy these products every day. So our knowledge has value. If you don't believe this to be true, then you either need to think about this a little more, or you work in an industry that is about to get disintermediated by emerce. So what should you do? Respect your value as a salesperson. Get mitments from your prospects. Get a mitment - Qualify them first for painswants, budget, and decision capability, Then before presenting details about your product. Get a mitment to make a definitive decision upon pletion of your presentation or the proof step of your sales cycle. For this to work, you must have asked really good questions to elicit the important painswants that are driving the sale. You must know that they have the money to buy it. And you must be presenting to the decision-maker. You only have so much time in a day air max 2015 black , so use it well. If you chase every deal that es your way, you are losing real sales that you could have gone out and looked for. Break any of these rules, and you are simply rolling the dice. (Yeah I know, this works for some people - but you'll never make it really big in sales winging it this way). Notice that what I outlined above is the reverse order of the way many salespeople have learned to sell. The key thing that I am telling you to do here, is to present AFTER you have qualified the prospect and AFTER you have a mitment to make a decision. If you have a long sales cycles involving multiple levels of decision-making, you can use this same approach. Instead of getting a mitment for a decision up-front, you can get a mitment to be taken to the appropriate next step. That could be a meeting with a higher-level decision-maker, or it could be earning the right to give a presentation to a more influential audience. I call this "chaining mitments". This is the best solution. By getting mitments, you will stop wasting time with the people who aren't serious about you. By asking good questions up-front (a topic for another newsletter), you may uncover something that your petitor missed, giving you a chance to change the rules of the sale set early on by your petitor's getting there first. If your product isn't better, I don't believe that you can persuade or convince someone that it is. Most people aren't stupid. They will figure out eventually that you are trying to pull one over on them, if they don't figure that out while you are actually trying to do it to them. Lastly air max classic bw black , even with the most petitive products, the number two product usually has some advantages over the number one product. Determine these advantages, and focus your selling efforts on the prospects who want such benefits. Create questions designed to uncover the painswants that would cause someone to want such benefits. Follow the process above of questions and mitments first, presentations last, and you'll find yourself making money even when you aren't selling for the number one pany. 1999-2004 Shamus Brown, All Rights Reserved. Shamus Brown is a Professional Sales Coach and former high-tech sales pro who began his career selling for IBM. Shamus has written more than 50 articles on selling and is the creator of the popular Persuasive Selling Skills CD Audio Program. You can read more of Shamus Brown's sales tips at Sales-Tips.industrialEGO. and you can learn more about his persuasive sales skills training at .Persuasive-Sales-Skills. ? Barack Obama won the 2008 presidential election with appeals to the middle class specifically in changing economic policy and achieving a better health care system with promises of a change in foreign policy and, most importantly, with a very clear, calculated attack on the. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seite: « 1 » |
[ Neuer Eintrag - letzter Post ] |
|
|
|
|